New, old, documents being sent in everyday. This one putting Eric Noveshen right in the mix with the grand ole NIR Group / AJW Partners lawsuits, dealings in securities.
**We have been sent a few leads to the offshore dealings, currently investigating the validity before presenting that information.
For more information on the damage done to investors by the NIR Group click the photo below to link to Teri Buhl’s must read financial investigative journalism site.
More information about NIR…
Parody or commentary, you decide.
Sometimes “It is hard to resist the urge to engage in tit-for-tat” reporting of Eric Noveshen’s underhanded litigation techniques.
The irony, Noveshen writes in motion he filed in September of 2015 that it is hard for him to “resist the urge to engage in tit-for-tat litigation and seek sanctions…” Has this man ever counted how many motions for sanctions he has filed against opponents? Is he high when he writes this garbage. Has he seen how many meritless motions he files going “tit for tat?” Does he realize he just filed a complaint that is 400 pages long? Or that he was admonished by a federal judge for his relentless attempts and numerous motions trying to depose a billionaire?
Take a look at some of his dockets judge for yourselves, a handful of non-current cases are linked below.
carter-v-noveshen-docket-broward-court
first-foreclose-436-v-c-wilson-broward-courts
noveshen-v-carufel-evans-broward-court
This site is intended for the sole purpose of providing due diligence on investment advisor Eric Noveshen. To provide background and education to potential clients. All of the content comes from relevant PUBLIC SOURCES – gathered in one place so people can decide for themselves if they feel comfortable with this individual handling their money.
These are his standard steps. Check the docket where Noveshen is litigating against a credit card company. Dockets don’t lie.
While Eric Noveshen is in pursuit of Does its good to know that InvestorsHUB.com defends the right to speak openly truthfully and anonymously online.
Many seasoned members have posted praise for Investor Hub’s commitment to protecting the identity of its speakers.
Without anonymity the site certainly would not have so many active members. That’s not to say Ihub allows people to come on its site and break the law. They don’t, but Eric Noveshen can’t expect to go on the site and trash talk people like Daniel Jacobs, Ella Licht and Scott Webber then expect no one will throw a curve ball back describing Noveshen’s own actions in the micro cap world.
The following is from SECURITIESLAWYER101.com, an informative piece about Investor Hubs commitment to protect the identity of its users.
To quote the article by investment goddess Brenda Hamilton, “A third subpoena went to online message board site Investor’s Hub (IHub). IHub, unlike the two clearing firms, chose to respond quickly. It objected that the subpoena was overly broad, requiring the production of tens of thousands of posts “relating to Calissio,” and personal information about dozens of the site’s members. IHub objected that “COR Clearing has failed to identify any actionable post in the underlying litigation. Nor has COR Clearing demonstrated that any of the Posters have any other potentially relevant or discoverable knowledge.” Noting that “similar subpoenas are frequently used to harass, intimidate and/or silence anonymous critics,” IHub asserted that the subpoena was a violation of its privacy policy and other contractual commitments to its members, adding that compliance with it would cause it to violate the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.”
A few of Noveshen’s unsavory posts about Florida Micro and it’s CEO Daniel Jacobs.
Federal and State laws offer the Noveshen and his John Does the same protections to write opinions and or negative things as long as they are true or based on truth
It is amazing how Eric Noveshen is able to convince attorneys – officers of the court who are supposed to uphold truth and justice, to give questionable statements, testimony and declarations in Noveshen’s custody battles. Why would business attorneys be commenting in custody cases? Financial ties make people do strange things.
Why does Eric Noveshen keep insisting he had no ties to the now defunct NIR fund when there is so much evidence to the contrary?
Maybe something to do with the massive SEC investigation and all the lawsuits that shut the New York based NIR Group down.
Eric Noveshen’s website rated risky.
Browsers beware! Eric Noveshen is using his Twitter account to direct viewers to his website noveshen fights back.
ScamAider.com rates websites for safety to viewers. Scamaider warns of a bad reputation and high risk for malware exposure to computers who visit Noveshen’s fight website. Malware can be used to collect information from personal computers like passwords and personal data.
Above a partial list of domains owned, operated by Noveshen. Proceed with caution.
Eric Noveshen Info 