Seventy two pages seems like a lot to hide. Read it here:
motion-to-quash-subpeonas-by-e-feb-1-2016
The Noveshen Blame Game, Try the Mirror?
Does Noveshen wrongly accuse so many of defamation and injury to his reputation, or is Noveshen playing the classic blame game rather than looking in the mirror for his culprit?
What’s Behind Noveshen’s Pick for a Mediator?
We got an inquiry last week. Someone ran out of patience when google turned up no reasons why Eric Noveshen would only want to use mediation services with one mediator in particular. With Noveshen there seems to always be a questionable calculation behind his legal actions. Most cannot be discovered until long after a case is over. In this question, Noveshen wants to use a former judge, Laura Watson, out of all the mediators in Broward County for a family mediation. We’ve already covered the “Why” behind some of Noveshen’s choices for mediators in some of Noveshen’s other Broward cases on this blog.
This one we could not explain without asking around. There are legal professionals who have been on the short end of the stick with the Noveshen legal connect-the-dots game and will talk. Those in the know, knew Noveshen’s family law attorney Robert Moraitis is on a friendly enough basis with Watson to have submitted an affidavit in her favor in 2014 when she was under investigation by the Florida Bar. She was later dismissed as a judge and is now doing mediation. There are no tags of the attorney’s name on an online post, just her name is tagged; this would have been long labor to find without help. Do favors sway favors? Maybe in a confidential mediation? Or maybe friendships? (the case of American Express vs. Cheryl Wilson and Eric Noveshen? case08025623) Only time or those in the know will tell. Good luck to you.
Noveshen & NIR /AJW Partners
New, old, documents being sent in everyday. This one putting Eric Noveshen right in the mix with the grand ole NIR Group / AJW Partners lawsuits, dealings in securities.
**We have been sent a few leads to the offshore dealings, currently investigating the validity before presenting that information.
For more information on the damage done to investors by the NIR Group click the photo below to link to Teri Buhl’s must read financial investigative journalism site.
More information about NIR…
Noveshen Says It’s “Hard to Resist the Urge to Engage in Tit-For-Tat Litigation”
Parody or commentary, you decide.
Sometimes “It is hard to resist the urge to engage in tit-for-tat” reporting of Eric Noveshen’s underhanded litigation techniques.
The irony, Noveshen writes in motion he filed in September of 2015 that it is hard for him to “resist the urge to engage in tit-for-tat litigation and seek sanctions…” Has this man ever counted how many motions for sanctions he has filed against opponents? Is he high when he writes this garbage. Has he seen how many meritless motions he files going “tit for tat?” Does he realize he just filed a complaint that is 400 pages long? Or that he was admonished by a federal judge for his relentless attempts and numerous motions trying to depose a billionaire?
Take a look at some of his dockets judge for yourselves, a handful of non-current cases are linked below.
carter-v-noveshen-docket-broward-court
first-foreclose-436-v-c-wilson-broward-courts
noveshen-v-carufel-evans-broward-court
Update: Noveshen’s 2nd American Express Lawsuit for Breach of Contract (Refusing to pay Bill).
Update on the second American Express lawsuit against Eric Noveshen.
It was filed in June 2016. Noveshen was served in July, 2016.
Noveshen asked for an extension of time to answer. A defendant usually has 20 days to answer a complaint.
A hearing was finally held on October 18, 2016. Noveshen did not even go. Maybe he’s too cool for Court, nah he loves the place. He knows he didn’t have to go and he still ended up getting a couple extra months to file an answer. (instead of being due in September) he gets until November.
Eric NoveshenInfo Provides Research on Financial Consultant
Repeat; reiterate, as Noveshen does;
This site is intended for the sole purpose of providing due diligence on investment advisor Eric Noveshen. To provide background and education to potential clients. All of the content comes from relevant PUBLIC SOURCES – gathered in one place so people can decide for themselves if they feel comfortable with this individual handling their money.
The NAICS classifies Eric Noveshen’s company Envision Capital LLCof Fort Lauderdale a provider of “Investment Advice.” When an “investment advisor,” brokerage firm, broker etc, is not registered with FINRA consumers have almost no collective source of information to decipher if it is safe to do business with the company. Investors of all income levels should have the right to relevant information about anyone managing their money or giving advice about the subject.
In this case, Noveshen was a registered broker up until 2003 or 04. According to its website, “FINRA also provides the public with access to relevant information about formerly registered brokers who, although no longer in the securities industry in a registered capacity, may work in other investment-related industries or may seek to attain other positions of trust with potential investors. Through its BrokerCheck service.”
Noveshen has not been registered in over TEN years. While the information FINRA provides is extremely important and relevant for clients deciding to engage with Noveshen, the picture is incomplete. This website is intended to do no more than provide background information on Mr. Noveshen to individuals and companies who may be looking to do business with him.
Noveshen is Unjustly Enriched by Frivilously using Florida’s courts to Dodge Credit Card Bills.
Unjust Enrichment, Noveshen is Unjustly Enriched by Frivilously using Florida’s courts to Dodge Credit Card Bills.
These are his standard steps. Check the docket where Noveshen is litigating against a credit card company. Dockets don’t lie.
1. Eric Noveshen charges $80,000 and enjoyed the high life.
2. Eric Noveshen and his Mom (Wilson) refuse to pay the bill.
3. American Express gets Judgment against Noveshen and his mother for just over $80,000.
4. Noveshen files frivolous appeal with Florida 4th District Appeals Court.
5. Noveshen’s legal games and deceit cost Amex so much he legal fees they settled for only
Tips for Dealing with Borderline Personalities in Court
Investors Hub Defends Privacy Rights of Members
While Eric Noveshen is in pursuit of Does its good to know that InvestorsHUB.com defends the right to speak openly truthfully and anonymously online.
Many seasoned members have posted praise for Investor Hub’s commitment to protecting the identity of its speakers.
Without anonymity the site certainly would not have so many active members. That’s not to say Ihub allows people to come on its site and break the law. They don’t, but Eric Noveshen can’t expect to go on the site and trash talk people like Daniel Jacobs, Ella Licht and Scott Webber then expect no one will throw a curve ball back describing Noveshen’s own actions in the micro cap world.
The following is from SECURITIESLAWYER101.com, an informative piece about Investor Hubs commitment to protect the identity of its users.
To quote the article by investment goddess Brenda Hamilton, “A third subpoena went to online message board site Investor’s Hub (IHub). IHub, unlike the two clearing firms, chose to respond quickly. It objected that the subpoena was overly broad, requiring the production of tens of thousands of posts “relating to Calissio,” and personal information about dozens of the site’s members. IHub objected that “COR Clearing has failed to identify any actionable post in the underlying litigation. Nor has COR Clearing demonstrated that any of the Posters have any other potentially relevant or discoverable knowledge.” Noting that “similar subpoenas are frequently used to harass, intimidate and/or silence anonymous critics,” IHub asserted that the subpoena was a violation of its privacy policy and other contractual commitments to its members, adding that compliance with it would cause it to violate the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.”
A few of Noveshen’s unsavory posts about Florida Micro and it’s CEO Daniel Jacobs.
Federal and State laws offer the Noveshen and his John Does the same protections to write opinions and or negative things as long as they are true or based on truth
Eric Noveshen Info 